The Two Kinds of Knowledge: Unlocking Spiritual Understanding
In his book "The Two Kinds of Knowledge," E.W. Kenyon explores the fundamental differences between two types of knowledge and how they impact our spiritual lives. As Christians, we often seek to deepen our understanding of God's Word and walk in faith, but we may not realize that there are two distinct kinds of knowledge that can shape our experiences. In this blog post, we'll examine the insights from Kenyon's book and discuss how understanding these two kinds of knowledge can revolutionize our spiritual journeys.
The Two Kinds of Knowledge
According to Kenyon, the two kinds of knowledge are:
The Limitations of the Knowledge of Facts
While the knowledge of facts is essential for navigating everyday life, it has its limitations when it comes to spiritual understanding. Kenyon argues that the knowledge of facts can:
The Power of the Knowledge of God
In contrast, the knowledge of God is transformative, experiential, and life-changing. When we tap into this kind of knowledge, we:
Practical Applications
So, how can we cultivate the knowledge of God and deepen our spiritual understanding? Here are a few practical takeaways:
Conclusion
E.W. Kenyon's teachings on the two kinds of knowledge offer a profound distinction that can revolutionize our spiritual lives. By recognizing the limitations of the knowledge of facts and seeking the knowledge of God, we can deepen our faith, intimacy with God, and understanding of His Word. May we all strive to cultivate this deeper kind of knowledge, and may it transform our lives and relationships with God.
In his influential teaching, E.W. Kenyon distinguishes between "Sense Knowledge" and "Revelation Knowledge," a dichotomy that forms the bedrock of modern Word of Faith theology. Kenyon argues that human conflict and spiritual powerlessness stem from a reliance on the five senses rather than the revealed Word of God.
Sense Knowledge refers to information gathered through sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. Kenyon posits that while this knowledge is necessary for physical existence and scientific advancement, it is inherently limited. It can only perceive the material world and is subject to the fluctuations of human emotion and physical circumstances. He suggests that since the Fall of Man, humanity has become "servants to the senses," leading to a state of spiritual blindness where people believe only what they can physically verify. two kinds of knowledge ew kenyon pdf
In contrast, Revelation Knowledge is spiritual insight derived directly from the Bible through the Holy Spirit. According to Kenyon, this is not something that can be reasoned out or learned in a laboratory; it is a "heart knowledge" that transcends intellectual understanding. He asserts that Revelation Knowledge allows the believer to see themselves as God sees them—righteous, healed, and victorious—regardless of what their physical body or bank account might suggest.
The tension between these two types of knowledge defines the believer's walk. Kenyon emphasizes that Sense Knowledge often contradicts the promises of God. For instance, the senses may report a "symptom" of illness, but Revelation Knowledge declares "by His stripes, we are healed." For Kenyon, faith is the act of giving Revelation Knowledge supremacy over Sense Knowledge. He famously taught that "what the senses cannot see, the spirit knows," urging Christians to renew their minds so that their primary reality is the Word of God rather than the physical environment.
Ultimately, Kenyon’s "Two Kinds of Knowledge" seeks to shift the believer from a victim of circumstance to a master of life. By recognizing the limitations of the physical senses and embracing the absolute authority of spiritual revelation, Kenyon believes a person can walk in the same power and fellowship with God that Adam experienced before the Fall.
If you are researching this for a theology paper or personal study, I can help you dive deeper. Compare Kenyon’s ideas to Classical Pentecostalism?
Analyze the historical criticisms of his "Sense Knowledge" theory?
The Two Kinds of Knowledge , E.W. Kenyon differentiates between "Sense Knowledge," which relies on the physical senses and intellectual reasoning, and "Revelation Knowledge," which is divine truth received by faith. Kenyon argues that believers must prioritize spiritual truth over physical evidence, enabling them to live in the reality of being "New Creations". Access a copy of the work at
E. W. Kenyon - The Two Types of Knowledge | PDF | Revelation
Two Kinds of Knowledge: A Comprehensive Analysis of E.W. Kenyon's Perspective
E.W. Kenyon, a renowned Bible teacher and scholar, introduced the concept of two kinds of knowledge in his teachings, which has been compiled and published in various forms, including PDF materials. This essay aims to provide an in-depth exploration of Kenyon's idea of two kinds of knowledge, its implications, and significance in Christian theology and spiritual growth.
Introduction to the Concept
According to Kenyon, there are two distinct types of knowledge: natural knowledge and spiritual knowledge. Natural knowledge refers to the information and understanding acquired through human experience, reasoning, and observation of the physical world. This type of knowledge is obtained through our senses, education, and interaction with the environment. On the other hand, spiritual knowledge is obtained through divine revelation, intuition, and a direct experience of God's presence.
Natural Knowledge
Natural knowledge, as described by Kenyon, is the realm of human understanding that is based on sensory perception and rational inquiry. This type of knowledge is commonly acquired through formal education, personal experiences, and cultural influences. Natural knowledge provides us with an understanding of the world around us, including science, history, and human relationships. While natural knowledge is essential for navigating everyday life, Kenyon argues that it is limited in its ability to provide true spiritual understanding and enlightenment. The Knowledge of Facts : This type of
Spiritual Knowledge
Spiritual knowledge, in contrast, is a deeper and more profound understanding that transcends human reasoning and empirical evidence. This type of knowledge is revealed through the Holy Spirit and is only accessible to those who have a personal relationship with God. Spiritual knowledge provides insight into the nature of God, His character, and His purposes. It enables believers to understand spiritual truths, discern God's will, and walk in faith and obedience.
The Limitations of Natural Knowledge
Kenyon emphasizes that natural knowledge has its limitations when it comes to spiritual matters. He argues that human intellect and reason alone cannot comprehend spiritual truths, as they are beyond human understanding. The natural mind is unable to grasp the depths of God's wisdom, and it often leads to spiritual confusion and doubt. Furthermore, natural knowledge can lead to a self-sufficient and prideful attitude, causing individuals to rely on their own abilities rather than on God's revelation.
The Preeminence of Spiritual Knowledge
In contrast, spiritual knowledge is preeminent in the life of a believer. Kenyon stresses that spiritual knowledge is essential for spiritual growth, maturity, and effective ministry. It enables believers to understand their identity in Christ, their spiritual authority, and their role in the body of Christ. Spiritual knowledge also provides the foundation for a strong faith, enabling believers to trust God in times of uncertainty and adversity.
Implications for Christian Life and Ministry
The concept of two kinds of knowledge has significant implications for Christian life and ministry. Firstly, it highlights the importance of seeking spiritual knowledge through prayer, meditation, and a personal relationship with God. Believers must recognize the limitations of natural knowledge and seek divine revelation to deepen their understanding of spiritual truths. Secondly, it emphasizes the need for spiritual discernment in evaluating information and experiences. Believers must learn to distinguish between natural and spiritual knowledge, lest they become confused or misled.
Conclusion
In conclusion, E.W. Kenyon's concept of two kinds of knowledge provides a profound insight into the nature of understanding and spiritual growth. The recognition of the limitations of natural knowledge and the preeminence of spiritual knowledge has significant implications for Christian life and ministry. As believers, we must seek to deepen our spiritual knowledge through a personal relationship with God, prayer, and meditation on His Word. By embracing spiritual knowledge, we can experience a more profound understanding of God's nature, His purposes, and our role in His kingdom.
References
Kenyon, E.W. (n.d.). The Two Kinds of Knowledge. PDF edition.
Kenyon, E.W. (1923). The Life of Faith. PDF edition. The Limitations of the Knowledge of Facts While
Kenyon, E.W. (1935). The Secret of Divine Strength. PDF edition.
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of E.W. Kenyon's concept of two kinds of knowledge. The ideas and teachings presented here are based on his written works, including PDF materials. The essay aims to provide a clear understanding of the two kinds of knowledge and their significance in Christian theology and spiritual growth.
How does reading this PDF change your Monday morning? Kenyon provides three practical steps within the text:
In the realm of Christian literature, few topics spark as much introspection as the distinction between intellectual assent and revelation truth. At the heart of this discussion lies a powerful, concise work by the influential Bible teacher E.W. Kenyon: "Two Kinds of Knowledge."
For decades, readers searching for the "two kinds of knowledge ew kenyon pdf" have sought to understand how Kenyon’s mid-20th century insights apply to the modern struggle between doubt and faith. This article explores the core tenets of that text, its availability as a PDF, and how Kenyon’s categories—Head Knowledge versus Heart Knowledge—transform the way we read Scripture.
E.W. Kenyon’s “two kinds of knowledge” offers a provocative epistemology for spiritual formation. While not replacing rational inquiry, it calls believers to prioritize revelation knowledge as the basis for faith, prayer, and identity in Christ. In an age of information overload, this distinction remains highly relevant.
Kenyon suggests that the modern church is often paralyzed because it tries to approach God using the wrong tool. We try to approach the Creator with Sense Knowledge.
He paints a picture of a believer who is intellectually brilliant but spiritually bankrupt. This person may have a PhD in Theology, having memorized the Greek and Hebrew roots of every scripture, yet they have no intimacy with the Father. Why? Because they are using their brain to analyze a Spirit.
Kenyon writes that Sense Knowledge is limited to the "realm of the senses." It can study creation, but it cannot know the Creator. It can study the effects of God, but it cannot know the cause.
"Sense Knowledge cannot find God... It is a blind leader of the blind." — E.W. Kenyon
Before examining the PDF, it is essential to understand the author. E.W. Kenyon (1867–1948) was a Bible teacher, pastor, and founder of the New Covenant Baptist Church. Though often associated with the Word of Faith movement, Kenyon was distinct in his deep focus on the legal and redemptive aspects of Christ’s work.
He coined many phrases that later became mainstream, such as "What I confess, I possess." His teachings emphasized the believer’s legal rights in Christ. The pamphlet "Two Kinds of Knowledge" is arguably one of his most philosophical works, bridging epistemology (the study of knowledge) with practical Christian living.